REPLY TO COMMENTARY A Discrepancy in Analyses of the MSCEIT—Resolving the Mystery and Understanding Its Implications: A Reply to Gignac (2005)
نویسندگان
چکیده
G. E. Gignac (2005) reanalyzed the factor structure of the Mayer–Salovey–Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT) and found results that differed from those the authors obtained initially. The authors tracked down the surprising sources of those discrepancies. G. E. Gignac’s hierarchical model of emotional intelligence appears promising, and the authors anticipate that further investigations of the MSCEIT factor structure may yield additional information.
منابع مشابه
Commentary: “Rabies in Iranian Traditional Medicine” & Reply to Commentary on “Rabies in Iran: Past, Present and Future”
متن کامل
Radically Questioning the Principle of the Least Restrictive Alternative: A Reply to Nir Eyal; Comment on “Nudging by Shaming, Shaming by Nudging”
In his insightful editorial, Nir Eyal explores the connections between nudging and shaming. One upshot of his argument is that we should question the principle of the least restrictive alternative in public health and health policy. In this commentary, I maintain that Eyal’s argument undermines only a rather implausible version of the principle of the least restrictive alternative and I sketch ...
متن کاملConfirmatory factor analysis of the Mayer¬タモSalovey¬タモCaruso Emotional Intelligence Test V 2.0 (MSCEIT)
Gignac (2005) and Palmer, Gignac, Manocha, and Stough (2005) recently raised important issues concerning the construct validity of the Mayer–Salovey–Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test Version 2.0 (MSCEIT; Mayer, Salovey, & Caruso, 2002). This study sought to further examine the constructs measured by the MSCEIT by replicating and extending their research through confirmatory factor analyses (CF...
متن کامل